Web 2.0: What’s the Big Idea (s)?

pexels-photo-239898.jpeg

WEB 2.0: What’s the Big Idea (s)?

by Aristee Georgiadou, revised April 20, 2018

 

The internet –cyberspace- in its public conception embodied the techno-utopianism of counter-culture movements of the ‘60s following the libertarian ideals of US politics of the time. It was meant to be above and beyond governments. The prevailing notion was derived from novels where the individual is in control of the cyberspace. The computers, on the other hand, were created in the ‘80s in response to the need of centralized management and increased control by companies. Fairly static and informational, the internet was popularized by the arrival of the web in 1993. Attempts to commercialize Web 1.0 famously failed on March 10, 2000 with the dot-com bust when NASDAQ lost 78% of its value.

 

Users had been deemed important since ’97. Application protocols enabled the e-mail first and when blogging begun, social networking was open. It went from physicists sharing research papers to people sharing cute cats providing User Generated Content (UGC) themselves, gradually colonizing everything in the network. What was once anarchic was now through the Architecture of Participation emancipatory; a dynamic and inexpensive production and reproduction of shared content by the many which bypasses the few and leads to a democratic revolution. Or does it? No doubt the web is powerful in environments of limited speech. It is how people were mobilized in unofficial uprisings. It is how governments engage more directly with citizens and the latter draw attention to local issues. Paradoxically though, information is commodified by the social networking sites (SNS) companies today thus becoming exploitative in nature.

pexels-photo-450035.jpeg

Access to information is expanded. The Wisdom of the Crowds has opened the way to collaborative knowledge communities. In contrast to the powerless audiences of the mass media, the new media decentralized the monopoly of information. Collective knowledge is shared. Yet its veracity is problematic. And inasmuch as we are becoming dependent on the digital we feel lost without it. By being connected we have instantly compromised our privacy, logged and available at all times. Isolation, self-reference and waste of time are other associated risks.

 

The volume, velocity and variety of data is epic in scale. Suffice it to note that 90% of today’s data was created in two years and more interaction is on the way. This information overload is difficult, impossible even, to assimilate and the feeling of missing out (FOMO) on not interacting socially is stressful enough without counting data theft or abuse of profiles from those digital traces devices and objects leave behind. Fake and hateful content owing to poor information ethics is yet another parameter. Two additional ideas upon which Web 2.0 is built on is Long Tail theory (benefits small segments of population which otherwise would have been left not catered for due to low demand) and open content where free software is available for everyone to use.

hands-people-woman-working.jpg

Following the adage “markets are conversations” Web 2.0 constitutes the transition to user-focused businesses, the realization that online users, unlike TV audiences, are participatory. Both controlling and controlled however. Under the allusion of providing control by enabling users the creation of profiles and interacting, companies enhance their own businesses drawing income from advertising. Through the process of horizontal integration the internet companies gain permanent control by increasingly knowing more about the users and their habits. In essence, social media can be both controlling and empowering in a fluctuating negotiated price, because of the importance of the users and their authenticity in communication.

Sources:
Anderson, P., (2007), “What is Web 2.0? Ideas, Technologies and Implications for Education”, JISC Technology & Standards Watch, pp 2-26.
Hepp, A., et al., (2018) “Transforming Communications: Studies in Cross-Media research”, Communicative Figurations, pp 3-6.
Hinton, S. & Hjorth, L., (2015), “Understanding Social Media”, SAGE, pp 7-31.

 

 

 

1 thought on “Web 2.0: What’s the Big Idea (s)?”

  1. Indisputably web 2.0 could be described as revolutionary or a revolution by its own right! Though, close observation of historical facts shows that revolutions become the new dogma after they settle in power and the new dominant agent of regulation.

    Based on this premises, we can examine that web 2.0 introduced new ground breaking online norms, technologies and services like blogs, Wikipedia, web services, user participation, wikis, web applications, photo sharing, Google ad sense and tagging to mention a few. Hence all these incredible technologies and services in addition to the mobile phone revolution enabled the masses to become co-creators of the web’s 2.0 content. Consequently leading to the gigantic production of data both in collective but also in an individual bases.

    The balance of social benefit and exploitation it is relative based on the point of view of the observer. Therefore as Howard Rheingold stated in “Tools for Thought” (1980) – “You can’t understand where mind-amplifying technology is going unless you understand where it came from.”

    It is constructive at this point to analyze web 2.0 in conjunction with web 1.0 and web 3.0. So web 1.0 introduced the web sites, Britannica online, Screen Scraping” information, publishing, CMS & HTML, desktop applications, photo publishing & directories with pre-set categories to mention a few. Subsequently taking is account the leading tendencies in web 2.0 we can assume that web 3.0 will become smarter and more sophisticated getting to know you better based on the data you are willing to share online (SNS profiles, browsing history, etc) hence deliver tailor made content which will be relevant to your online profile.

    In general bad business practices were apparent in web 1.0 and still are in web 2.0. Occasions like the Facebook hearings by the congress and self-regulative initiatives by the industry are good practices in order distill web 2.0 of blemishes before we proceed to web 3.0!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s